Tuesday, April 26, 2016

India with the ‘Shanti Mask’


By:       Aasef Chauhdry

Since long the Indians were raising a false alarm about Pakistan’s so-called interference inside India and sponsoring the terrorist acts. There is an old saying that you can make fool some people, some time but not all the people all the time. Same was the case about the Indian cunning strategy vis-à-vis Pakistan. A section of smart world did believe the Indians for some time and fell prey to their notorious propaganda however, soon they realised that it’s the thief who is shouting at the top of his voice, “thief, thief….. catch him”.
The latest drama by the Indians just before the drop scene of a ‘reality show’ in Pakistan was attack on Pathankot. Our neighbour would have again touched the heights of a filthy propaganda had Pakistan’s agencies not nabbed their serving commander red handed while planning and commanding the terrorist activities inside Pakistan and categorically in Balochistan thus making it the most turbulent province of the country. It’s on record that the so called biggest democracy of the world India has never accepted the reality of partition of sub continent and has always sponsoring terrorism in Pakistan through its proxies. Unfortunately her past experience in case of East Pakistan has wrongly encouraged her hence now, to re-alive the 1971 experience, Indian Govt has tasked RAW to support terrorist activities in Balochistan.
Pakistan has been all along making hue and cry to the world to realise the true and hegemonic intentions and designs of aggressor India but world never took the issues seriously. Pakistan, without any doubt is a peace loving country and promoting peace in the neighborhood/region and non interference on bilateralism basis have been the key components of Pakistan’s foreign policy initiatives. However, despite the unprecedented efforts by Pakistan the latter’s sacrifices while fighting against terrorism have never been acknowledged.
Till date, all the allegations that India has placed on Pakistan are totally on hear-say basis and our neighbour has never succeeded in proving Pakistan’s hand in such so-called subversive activities. While contrary to that history quotes about dozens of various instances of Indian involvement in Pakistan like support to Mukti Bahini in creation of Bangladesh, exploitation of sub nationalists in Balochistan and Sindh links with sectarian extremists groups including TTP etc to create unrest in FATA/overall country. Unfortunately this all is happening through the kind courtesy of the India James Bond Ajit Doval, whose offensive-defensive doctrine is enough to make the world understand about the Indian intents vis-à-vis Pakistan.
What world must not forget is that Pakistan itself is a major victim of terrorism waged by state and non state actors, nevertheless, India is mindlessly pursuing the same old obsolete anti Pakistan narratives concerning terrorism. The Indian establishment vis-à-vis Doval have become habitual of organizing false flag operations. They create false alerts, security hype and attract attention of international community etc. Pathankot incident is another attempt of Doval’s mischievous scheming against Pakistan after the shameful failure of terror boat drama last year.
While coming to Doval, it may be noted that  besides planning various terror attacks in Pakistan as part of Indian offensive-defensive doctrine, India’s devilish NSA (National Security Agency) has now started arranging and executing various subversive acts inside India to shift the blame game to Pakistan like orchestrated drama of Gurdaspur episode, boat incident etc. The main aims behind were to defame Pakistan and its security agencies. Those who still have doubts about the false flag operations being conducted itself by the Indian government, they must read the report that carried out by Indian media and which shows that former home ministry officer R.V.S Mani had submitted signed affidavits in court citing member of CBI-SIT team accused incumbent governments of orchestrating the terror attack on Indian Parliament and the 26/11 carnage in Mumbai.
The Indians as they asked for Pakistan’s help, instead of appreciating Pakistan’s gesture about sending the JIT, are creating hurdles in Pak JIT’s investigations that discredited Indian claims. The Pak JIT had asked for handing over swab of four alleged terrorists Nasir Hussain (Punjab), Abu Bakar (Gujranwala) and Umar Farooq and Abdul Qayum (both from Sindh), however, the JIT was provided the DNA reports instead. The Pakistani team found the lights along 24 Kms perimeter wall of Pathankot airbase to be faulty on the eve of the attack, whereas, according to the report the Pak JIT team was only informed about the negligence of Border Security Force (BSF) and Indian forces and the important fact about perimeter blackout was intentionally skipped.
The recent shocking happening in this regard is the murder of NIA Muslim Officer Tanzil Ahmed who was believed to have irrefutable proofs about the Indian agencies involvement in the Pathankot Attack. No one has forgotten about the mysterious murder of the Indian police officer Hemant Karkare who was killed by Hindu extremists after he had exposed their involvement (saffron terror) in the wave of terrorist incidents of 2008 Malegaon in India. Like Hemant, Tanzil Ahmed was also part of the India government team to probe Pathankot terror attack. He was punished for having knowledge about the false flag operation at Pathankot and was suspected of sharing the same thing with the Pak team.
The world must not forget that Pakistan condemns terrorism of all sorts and is committed to stand by its international commitments. The security policy of Pakistan supported by all stake holders including the Government and Security institutions aims at eradicating terrorists from its soil. India’s various mischievous attempts to hyphenate Pakistan with terrorism will definitely remain futile despite the Indian media’s frenzy and volley of allegations against Pakistan which is a true reflection of Indian establishment and Hindu mindset which are intolerant to any improvement in the bilateral relations between both neighboring countries.


No comments: