By Sajjad Shaukat
International
 politics is passing through transitory period, as rapidly developing 
geo-political differences among global powers in Asia show that the next
 Cold War is likely to be waged between the Russia-China alliance and 
the US-led bloc in Asia, while Pakistan has already become its arena. 
In
 this regard, US still backs Indian hegemony in Asia to counterbalance 
China. During American President Barack Obama’s visit to India, on 
January 25, this year, the US and India announced a breakthrough on a 
pact which would allow American companies to supply New Delhi with 
civilian nuclear technology. On November 2, 2010, US agreed to sell 
India the most expensive—the new F-35 fighter jets including US F-16 and
 F-18 fighters, C-17 and C-130 aircraft, radar systems, Harpoon weapons 
etc. Besides acquisition of arms and weapons from other western 
countries—especially Israel, America is a potential military supplier to
 India. US also pressurized International Atomic Energy Agency and the 
Nuclear Suppliers Group to grant a waiver to New Delhi for obtaining 
civil nuclear trade on larger scale. However, US President Obama also 
announced $4 billion of new initiatives aimed at boosting trade and 
investment ties as well as jobs in India.
In
 this respect, Indian Foreign Mistier Sushma Swaraj was on a maiden 
visit to China since January 31, 2015. Along with sideline commitments, 
she attended 13th trilateral meeting between China, India and Russia 
held in Beijing on February 2, 2015. She was having series of meetings 
with Chinese leaders in the backdrop of recently concluded visit of US 
President Obama to India. 
In
 the joint communiqué of their trilateral meeting, the foreign ministers
 of Russia, India and China have emphasized cooperation to maintain 
international and regional peace and stability and promoting global 
economic growth and prosperity. But with the support of America, New 
Delhi has been playing double game with Beijing and Moscow.
The
 warming up of Indo-US relations, especially in the nuclear domain poses
 a direct threat to Chinese national interests, and both China and 
Russia feel uneasy over Indian overtures towards US. Consequently, as 
part of duplicity, Indian leadership is launching intense diplomatic 
activities to conciliate Beijing and Moscow that their overtures to US 
will not be at the cost of bilateral relations with Russia and China. 
In
 fact, US in the garb of this controversial deal is enticing New Delhi 
to assume anti-China role and would have footprints in India to 
eavesdrop Chinese activities. China is apprehensive about the emerging 
threat, as the intent of President Obama and Prime Minister Narendra 
Modi was quite clear, while mentioning about free sea lanes and air 
passages in the South China Sea. Russia, however, remained quiet over 
Obama’s comments at a press conference in Delhi slamming President 
Vladimir Putin’s role in Ukraine. 
It
 is notable that in 2013, during his visit to New Delhi, and after 
meeting Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Chinese Prime Minister Li 
Keqiang said that the two emerging Asian economies were going to enhance
 cooperation. No doubt, Beijing wants cordial relationship with New 
Delhi. But, India which apparently emphasizes mutual cooperation with 
China, showing lethargic approach in the solution of border dispute, has
 been increasing military build near the Chinese border, coupled with 
secret support to the Tibetan insurgents as part of its overt and covert
 maneuvering.
In
 the recent, part, tension arose between India and China when Indian 
army erected a military camp in Chumar Sector of Ladakh at the Line of 
Actual Control (LAC)-disputed border, situated between the two 
countries. Similarly, Indian soldiers crossed over the Line of Control 
(LoC) in Kashmir on January 6, 2012 and attacked a Pakistani check post,
 killing one Pakistani soldier. Afterwards, Indian troops shot dead more
 Pakistani soldiers on the LoC.
It
 is mentionable that under the Pak-China pretext, Indian ex-Army Chief, 
General Deepak Kapoor, revealed on December 29, 2010 that the Indian 
army “is now revising its five-year old doctrine” and is preparing for a
 “possible two-front war with China and Pakistan.”
Particularly,
 fast growing economic power of China coupled with her rising strategic 
relationship with the Third World has irked the eyes of Americans and 
Indians. Owing to jealousy, America desires to make India a major power 
to counterbalance China in Asia. 
Besides,
 it is due to the fact Pakistan has a strategic geo-political location 
at the corridor of world’s major maritime oil supply lines, and has 
close proximity to oil rich Central Asian countries. Its location could 
influences Central Asia, South Asia and the Middle East. Besides, Balochistan’s
 mineral resources and geo-strategic location with deep Gwadar seaport, 
entailing Islamabad’s close ties with Beijing pinches the eyes of the 
US, India, Israel and some western countries.  Beijing has already 
invested billion of dollars to develop Gwadar seaport. It is owing to 
multiple strategic designs that the US backs India in destabilizing both
 Pakistan and Iran. Notably, by rejecting US growing pressure, on March 
11, 2013, Pakistan’s President Asif Ali Zardari inaugurated the gas 
pipeline project with Iran. 
Taking cognizance of the enemy’s intensions, during
 his trip to Beijing, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and Chinese
 Prime Minister Li Keqiang signed eight agreements on July 5, 2013 in 
various fields. The most important one envisages the establishment of 
China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) between deep Gwadar seaport of 
Balochistan and the historic Silk Road city in western regions-Xinjiang 
of China—connecting to Gilgit-Baltistan through Khunjerab Pass. Beijing 
has also offered to build an international airport, while the roads 
infrastructure in Gwadar would be connected with the communication 
network of rest of the country to facilitate transportation of goods. By
 rejecting US growing pressure, Pakistan has handed over the control of 
Gwader seaport to China.
While,
 in May, 2013, a day before Chinese Premier Li Keqiang arrived in 
Islamabad; Chinese engineers being driven through Clifton Block-1 in 
Karachi escaped a major bomb attack. As regards anti-China diplomacy, 
Afghanistan has become a hub from where external secret agencies like 
Indian RAW and Israeli Mossad have been assisting subversive activities 
in other parts of Pakistan—especially in Balochistan through their 
affiliated militant groups at the cost of Pakistan, China and Iran. In 
the past few years, they abducted and killed many Chinese and Iranian 
nationals in Pakistan.
It
 worth-mentioning that during China’s visit of Pakistan’s Chief of Army 
Staff Gen. Raheel Sharif, on January 25, this year, China’s Vice 
Chairman of Central Military Commission Gen. Fan has assured that China 
will assist Pakistan in every challenge.
Taking
 note of US supported Indian plans; Pakistan has also cultivated its 
relationship with the Russian Federation. In 2012, Moscow and Islamabad 
agreed to enhance bilateral relations in diverse fields. Addressing a 
joint press conference with Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar in 
Islamabad on October 4, 2012, Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov said 
that the two countries agreed that they had common goals on regional and
 current global challenges. Lavrov stated that Russia supports 
Pakistan’s stance on Afghanistan by pointing out that any solution 
imposed from outside would not work there.
In
 2010, the then Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin publicly endorsed 
Pakistan’s bid to join the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), 
which includes the former Central Asian republics as permanent members. 
Putin also remarked that Pakistan was a very important partner in South 
Asia and the Muslim world for Russia.
The
 then President of Pakistan Asif Ali Zardari participated in the 12th 
summit of the SCO held in Beijing. While addressing the summit, hinting 
out towards Indo-US secret designs, Chinese president Hu Jintao said, 
“The international situation has been complex, thus bringing many 
uncertainties to the regional situation.” He explained that only when 
SCO member states remain united can they effectively cope with emerging 
challenges. President Putin said, “The SCO should enhance security 
cooperation.”
In
 fact, China, Pakistan, Russia and Iran know that after the withdrawal 
of most of the NATO troops from Afghanistan, the US-led NATO has been 
maintaining military presence in that country, having eyes on the energy
 resources of Central Asia, while encouraging Indian role in 
Afghanistan. 
It
 is noteworthy that on July 20, 2011, while hinting towards Pak-China 
ties, the then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton urged India to be 
more assertive in Asia, saying that as American ally, the country should
 play more of a leadership role. She explained, “India has the potential
 to positively shape the future of the Asia-Pacific.”  
Nonetheless, US
 approach of backing Indian role in Asia would cause imbalance in the 
region with serious implications for global security, and will embolden 
India to attain her   hegemonic designs at the cost of modern world 
trends such as peaceful settlement of disputes, economic development and
 disarmament. 
Sajjad
 Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US 
vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in 
International Relations
Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com
 
No comments:
Post a Comment