By Sajjad Shaukat
International
politics is passing through transitory period, as rapidly developing
geo-political differences among global powers in Asia show that the next
Cold War is likely to be waged between the Russia-China alliance and
the US-led bloc in Asia, while Pakistan has already become its arena.
In
this regard, US still backs Indian hegemony in Asia to counterbalance
China. During American President Barack Obama’s visit to India, on
January 25, this year, the US and India announced a breakthrough on a
pact which would allow American companies to supply New Delhi with
civilian nuclear technology. On November 2, 2010, US agreed to sell
India the most expensive—the new F-35 fighter jets including US F-16 and
F-18 fighters, C-17 and C-130 aircraft, radar systems, Harpoon weapons
etc. Besides acquisition of arms and weapons from other western
countries—especially Israel, America is a potential military supplier to
India. US also pressurized International Atomic Energy Agency and the
Nuclear Suppliers Group to grant a waiver to New Delhi for obtaining
civil nuclear trade on larger scale. However, US President Obama also
announced $4 billion of new initiatives aimed at boosting trade and
investment ties as well as jobs in India.
In
this respect, Indian Foreign Mistier Sushma Swaraj was on a maiden
visit to China since January 31, 2015. Along with sideline commitments,
she attended 13th trilateral meeting between China, India and Russia
held in Beijing on February 2, 2015. She was having series of meetings
with Chinese leaders in the backdrop of recently concluded visit of US
President Obama to India.
In
the joint communiqué of their trilateral meeting, the foreign ministers
of Russia, India and China have emphasized cooperation to maintain
international and regional peace and stability and promoting global
economic growth and prosperity. But with the support of America, New
Delhi has been playing double game with Beijing and Moscow.
The
warming up of Indo-US relations, especially in the nuclear domain poses
a direct threat to Chinese national interests, and both China and
Russia feel uneasy over Indian overtures towards US. Consequently, as
part of duplicity, Indian leadership is launching intense diplomatic
activities to conciliate Beijing and Moscow that their overtures to US
will not be at the cost of bilateral relations with Russia and China.
In
fact, US in the garb of this controversial deal is enticing New Delhi
to assume anti-China role and would have footprints in India to
eavesdrop Chinese activities. China is apprehensive about the emerging
threat, as the intent of President Obama and Prime Minister Narendra
Modi was quite clear, while mentioning about free sea lanes and air
passages in the South China Sea. Russia, however, remained quiet over
Obama’s comments at a press conference in Delhi slamming President
Vladimir Putin’s role in Ukraine.
It
is notable that in 2013, during his visit to New Delhi, and after
meeting Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Chinese Prime Minister Li
Keqiang said that the two emerging Asian economies were going to enhance
cooperation. No doubt, Beijing wants cordial relationship with New
Delhi. But, India which apparently emphasizes mutual cooperation with
China, showing lethargic approach in the solution of border dispute, has
been increasing military build near the Chinese border, coupled with
secret support to the Tibetan insurgents as part of its overt and covert
maneuvering.
In
the recent, part, tension arose between India and China when Indian
army erected a military camp in Chumar Sector of Ladakh at the Line of
Actual Control (LAC)-disputed border, situated between the two
countries. Similarly, Indian soldiers crossed over the Line of Control
(LoC) in Kashmir on January 6, 2012 and attacked a Pakistani check post,
killing one Pakistani soldier. Afterwards, Indian troops shot dead more
Pakistani soldiers on the LoC.
It
is mentionable that under the Pak-China pretext, Indian ex-Army Chief,
General Deepak Kapoor, revealed on December 29, 2010 that the Indian
army “is now revising its five-year old doctrine” and is preparing for a
“possible two-front war with China and Pakistan.”
Particularly,
fast growing economic power of China coupled with her rising strategic
relationship with the Third World has irked the eyes of Americans and
Indians. Owing to jealousy, America desires to make India a major power
to counterbalance China in Asia.
Besides,
it is due to the fact Pakistan has a strategic geo-political location
at the corridor of world’s major maritime oil supply lines, and has
close proximity to oil rich Central Asian countries. Its location could
influences Central Asia, South Asia and the Middle East. Besides, Balochistan’s
mineral resources and geo-strategic location with deep Gwadar seaport,
entailing Islamabad’s close ties with Beijing pinches the eyes of the
US, India, Israel and some western countries. Beijing has already
invested billion of dollars to develop Gwadar seaport. It is owing to
multiple strategic designs that the US backs India in destabilizing both
Pakistan and Iran. Notably, by rejecting US growing pressure, on March
11, 2013, Pakistan’s President Asif Ali Zardari inaugurated the gas
pipeline project with Iran.
Taking cognizance of the enemy’s intensions, during
his trip to Beijing, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and Chinese
Prime Minister Li Keqiang signed eight agreements on July 5, 2013 in
various fields. The most important one envisages the establishment of
China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) between deep Gwadar seaport of
Balochistan and the historic Silk Road city in western regions-Xinjiang
of China—connecting to Gilgit-Baltistan through Khunjerab Pass. Beijing
has also offered to build an international airport, while the roads
infrastructure in Gwadar would be connected with the communication
network of rest of the country to facilitate transportation of goods. By
rejecting US growing pressure, Pakistan has handed over the control of
Gwader seaport to China.
While,
in May, 2013, a day before Chinese Premier Li Keqiang arrived in
Islamabad; Chinese engineers being driven through Clifton Block-1 in
Karachi escaped a major bomb attack. As regards anti-China diplomacy,
Afghanistan has become a hub from where external secret agencies like
Indian RAW and Israeli Mossad have been assisting subversive activities
in other parts of Pakistan—especially in Balochistan through their
affiliated militant groups at the cost of Pakistan, China and Iran. In
the past few years, they abducted and killed many Chinese and Iranian
nationals in Pakistan.
It
worth-mentioning that during China’s visit of Pakistan’s Chief of Army
Staff Gen. Raheel Sharif, on January 25, this year, China’s Vice
Chairman of Central Military Commission Gen. Fan has assured that China
will assist Pakistan in every challenge.
Taking
note of US supported Indian plans; Pakistan has also cultivated its
relationship with the Russian Federation. In 2012, Moscow and Islamabad
agreed to enhance bilateral relations in diverse fields. Addressing a
joint press conference with Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar in
Islamabad on October 4, 2012, Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov said
that the two countries agreed that they had common goals on regional and
current global challenges. Lavrov stated that Russia supports
Pakistan’s stance on Afghanistan by pointing out that any solution
imposed from outside would not work there.
In
2010, the then Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin publicly endorsed
Pakistan’s bid to join the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO),
which includes the former Central Asian republics as permanent members.
Putin also remarked that Pakistan was a very important partner in South
Asia and the Muslim world for Russia.
The
then President of Pakistan Asif Ali Zardari participated in the 12th
summit of the SCO held in Beijing. While addressing the summit, hinting
out towards Indo-US secret designs, Chinese president Hu Jintao said,
“The international situation has been complex, thus bringing many
uncertainties to the regional situation.” He explained that only when
SCO member states remain united can they effectively cope with emerging
challenges. President Putin said, “The SCO should enhance security
cooperation.”
In
fact, China, Pakistan, Russia and Iran know that after the withdrawal
of most of the NATO troops from Afghanistan, the US-led NATO has been
maintaining military presence in that country, having eyes on the energy
resources of Central Asia, while encouraging Indian role in
Afghanistan.
It
is noteworthy that on July 20, 2011, while hinting towards Pak-China
ties, the then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton urged India to be
more assertive in Asia, saying that as American ally, the country should
play more of a leadership role. She explained, “India has the potential
to positively shape the future of the Asia-Pacific.”
Nonetheless, US
approach of backing Indian role in Asia would cause imbalance in the
region with serious implications for global security, and will embolden
India to attain her hegemonic designs at the cost of modern world
trends such as peaceful settlement of disputes, economic development and
disarmament.
Sajjad
Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US
vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in
International Relations
Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com
No comments:
Post a Comment